each account has access to the programs

each account can be user defined (with the exception of Iconpackager - it's kinda global)

if he don't want, he don't run it

I ask this because I also have a Laptop and Desktop computer,
and occasionally my Daughter comes to visit, and uses my Desktop computer.

from the WB EULA (there's one in each respective apps folder

YOU MAY:
1. Install and use one copy of the
SOFTWARE on a single computer.

2. Install a second copy of the SOFTWARE on a
second computer only if you are the main user of
this computer (home computer or laptop for
example).

3. Install the SOFTWARE on another computer only
if you change your main workstation. In such a case
you must uninstall the software from the old
computer.

4. Use the SOFTWARE via a network, only if you
have purchased an adequate number of licenses.
The number of users must not exceed the number of
licenses you have purchased.

5. Make a copy of the SOFTWARE for archival
purposes only.

Sorry Bichur, don't take this personally, but for me that doesn't answer the question at all.
Let me see if I can put this more clearly, (Substitute "Me/I" and "My Daughter" with "OP" and "OP's Son" where appropriate):

Both my Laptop and Desktop have WindowBlinds, Sound Packager and CursorFX running when they are on.
My Daughter comes to visit, and gets busy on MY Desktop computer where the Stardock software IS running,
aka. she is "using" the software.
I, at the same time, decides to do some graphic work on my Laptop, where the Stardock software is ALSO running,
aka. I am also "using" the Software.
In this case, this means that on both computers the Software is "being used".

Keeping in mind that she uses my account, (I only have one account on both machines),
the question then is, is that allowed, aka. a violation of the TOS/EULA?
Or is it ok due to me not personally using the Desktop at the same time as I am working on my Laptop?
Or would a workaround be that I'd have to make her her own account (which I really don't want to do)?

I hope that makes the question somewhat clearer...

You bought it - you can install it on one computer (pc)

You can install it on another computer (lap) if you are the main user

your daughter is visting - doesn't count - not the same as if you went over to her place and installed so it would be there when you visited

I think the FAQ is slightly out dated - the EULAs were basically the same, but have changed

Plus, an FAQ is just that - an FAQ

You're not bound by FAQa your bound by EULAs

besides, how the that FAQ fit with Multiplicity which is designed to control multiple computers?

check the EULA I posted from the WB folder

it does say that you have to be the main user - it doesn't say you can only use one at a time

I don't believe Stardock would complain as long as it's on a family computer(s) in the same house or on a laptop that is taken to work. As long as the software is not 'shared' with friends outside of this environment you should be within acceptable use of the TOS.

As the op's question has been answered this post is locked.

Technically, yes, this would be a violation of the EULA.  Are we going to do anything about it in this situation? No.  Most of the legalese in the EULA is simply to cover our asses.  Ultimately, if someone is violating it we would have the burden of enforcing it, and we're not about to go around checking to make sure that dad and son are not both using the computers with a WindowBlind applied at the same time.

The wording in the EULA is not there so we can be jerks to our customers, it's there to prevent someone from buying a single license for one of our software titles and sharing it with all their buddies.